ABOUT
Devoted to Iowa’s Appellate Litigation System
With a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to providing updates and analysis of current and ongoing appellate litigation.
The site offers benefits to attorneys, parties to litigation, and others affected by the arguments and outcomes of appellate litigation.
How Appellate Procedure Works in Iowa
- All appeals on civil and criminal matters come directly to the Iowa Supreme Court.
- Staff attorneys in the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office review all appeals and write a memo to the justices recommending whether a case should be retained by the Supreme Court or transferred to the Court of Appeals.
- Panels of three justices read those memos each month and choose which cases will be retained and which will be transferred to the Court of Appeals. It takes two votes to retain a case, but most votes on retaining cases are unanimous.
- Three-judge panels hear cases transferred to the Court of Appeals by the Supreme Court. Parties may apply to the Supreme Court for further review of a decision by the Court of Appeals.
- About 500 such applications for further review are filed with the Court each year.
- Every justice reads those applications, the Court of Appeals ruling, related briefs, and the court record.
- Then the justices vote on a “voting sheet” — marking “Y” for yes, “N” for no.
- Yes means at least a justice wants to review the case with the full court in conference, or at least look further into the case. A case may be held over and one justice may be delegated to look further into the case.
- Only one “Y” vote is needed for a case to go to a conference. All “N”s mean that case does not go to a conference. Yes votes may include comments from the justices, which are circulated, and there may be some back and forth among the justices.
- It takes the vote of four of the seven justices to grant further review.
[Note: This description of Iowa’s appellate procedure is based on an October 2020 interview with Iowa Supreme Court Justice Edward Mansfield by the Judicial Branch’s “In the Balance” podcast.]
Site Information About Appellate Litigation Includes:
- Descriptions of case rulings
- News related to state and federal appeals courts
- Case descriptions of upcoming arguments
- Calendar of cases:
- Cases argued by month
- Cases set for argument
- Cases screened for Iowa Supreme Court review
- Cases granted further review
- Access to briefs filed:
- Appellant briefs
- Appellee briefs
- Appellant reply briefs
- Amicus briefs
The blog is compiled and edited by attorneys and contributors at Nyemaster Goode. Iowa’s
largest law firm, Nyemaster Goode provides outstanding legal service to clients that range from individuals and emerging start-ups to Fortune 500 companies.
FEATURED POSTS
Names of applicants seeking appointment to Scott County Board of Supervisors are public records, Iowa Supreme Court holds
Scott County officials violated the Iowa Open Records Act when they made an appointment to fill a mid-term vacancy on the Board of Supervisors without publicly revealing the identities of any of the applicants, the Iowa Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision handed down Feb. 14.
Iowa Supreme Court to hear arguments in nine cases Feb. 17-19
The Iowa Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in nine cases Feb. 17, 18, and 19. Four other cases will be submitted to the Court without oral argument. Following are brief summaries of the February cases, not including an attorney disciplinary case.
Iowa Supreme Court to hear arguments in assisted-reproduction fraud case in a special evening session Feb. 11
Bert and Donna Millers’ desire to conceive children in the 1950s was realized with the assistance of Dr. John Randall, a physician and head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Iowa Hospitals, and Donna gave birth to two children via artificial insemination.
Roofing company’s 30-day grace period and 1.5% monthly default charge is not subject to Consumer Credit Code
A roofing contractor who granted its customer a 30-day grace period to pay for a roofing job along with 1.5% a month in interest for tardy payment did not grant credit and is not subject to the Iowa Consumer Credit Code, the Iowa Supreme Court held in a unanimous Jan. 24 decision.
STAY UPDATED
Get email alerts. You’ll never miss important posts about court cases, decisions, and news.
EDITORIAL TEAM
ABOUT
On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.