UPDATES & ANALYSIS

7.25

8th Circuit: South Dakota Can Require Doctors to Warn Abortion-Seekers of Increased Suicide Risk

by Ryan Koopmans | July 25, 2012

By Ryan Koopmans

In an en banc opinion released this week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upheld the portion of a 2005 South Dakota law that requires doctors to warn women that having an abortion could result in an increased risk of suicide.  The Court rejected two challenges to the law, ruling that that the suicide advisory requirement neither unduly burdens abortion rights nor violates physicians’ free speech rights.  This opinion reverses prior decisions by the district court and a three-member panel of the Eighth Circuit, and removes a permanent junction against enforcing the suicide advisory requirement.

The Eighth Circuit’s en banc review was granted only with respect to the suicide advisory requirement, which was part of a broader South Dakota law containing numerous provisions relating to informed consent requirements with respect to abortions.  The full opinion is here.  Our past coverage of the oral arguments is here.

SHARE

Tags:

FEATURED POSTS

February 2024 Opinion Roundup

The Iowa Supreme Court entered opinions in eighteen cases during February 2024. You can read Rox Laird’s analysis of Singh v. McDermott, Selden v. DMACC, and Senator Roby Smith et al. v. Iowa District Court for Polk County. The remaining opinions from February are summarized here.

APPELLATE CALENDAR

  • Iowa Supreme Court Oral Arguments
  • Iowa Supreme Court Opinion and/or Further Review Conference
  • Iowa Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
  • Holidays

EDITORIAL TEAM

ABOUT

On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

RELATED BLOGS

Related Links

ARCHIVES