UPDATES & ANALYSIS
A New Fast Track for Certified Questions?
By Ryan Koopmans
Sometimes issues of state law come up in federal cases. When that happens, and when the state law is unclear, federal courts can certify the question to the state’s highest court, asking it to weigh in. This certification process stops the federal case until the state court rules, however, which can present problems for the litigants if the state court takes a long time to answer the certified question.
The justices of the Iowa Supreme Court appear to understand this. Indeed, based on their decisions in Iowa Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. Tooker and Oyens Feed & Supply, Inc. v. Primebank, they’re working to speed up the certification process. The Court issued its opinion in Iowa Right to Life just 183 days after the federal court certified the question, its opinion in Oyens Feed only 270 days after the federal court sought its guidance. And both decisions—authored by Justices Mansfield and Waterman respectively— came within three weeks of oral argument. That’s fast.
And much faster than the Court moved in the past. From January 2001 to December 29, 2011, the Court issued seven decisions in which it answered certified questions from a federal court. On average, those decisions took 498 days from the date that the federal court certified the question. (A chart with relevant dates appears after the jump.)
The Iowa Supreme Court’s likely prize for answering the Right to Life and Oyens Feed questions so quickly: more certified questions.
Certified Questions 2001-2011
FEATURED POSTS
November 2024 Opinion Roundup
The Iowa Supreme Court entered opinions in eleven cases in November 2024. In addition to the four cases covered in individual stories on the blog, the remaining opinions from November are summarized below.
Iowa Supreme Court to hear arguments in 10 cases Dec. 17 and 18
The Iowa Supreme Court will hear arguments in 10 cases Dec. 17 and 18, and three other cases will be submitted to the Court without oral argument. Following are brief summaries of the December cases.
No Fourth Amendment violation in vehicle search after drug-sniffing dog sticks its nose through an open window, Iowa Supreme Court holds
The Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure was not violated when a drug detection dog inserted its nose into the open window of a suspect’s vehicle, the Iowa Supreme Court held in a divided Dec. 6 decision.
Landowners challenging DOT eminent domain action missed a critical filing deadline, Iowa Supreme Court holds
Owners of farmland in Story County seeking to block the Iowa Department of Transportation’s condemnation of part of their property for a highway project succeeded in getting their appeal before the Iowa Supreme Court even after missing one filing deadline, but they lost their bid to revive their case in district court because they missed a second and critical deadline.
EDITORIAL TEAM
ABOUT
On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.