UPDATES & ANALYSIS

3.01

Attorney General Miller Urges U.S. Supreme Court to Strike Down Prop 8 and DOMA

by Ryan Koopmans | March 1, 2013

By Ryan Koopmans

Yesterday, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the California “Prop 8” case about same-sex marriage.  Attorney General Miller, and the attorneys general of 12 other states and the District of Columbia, argue that California’s ban on same-sex marriage is not rationally related to any government interests and is therefore unconstitutional.

Miller is also expected to file a brief today on behalf of Iowa that urges the Supreme Court to strike down the federal Defense of Marriage Act, otherwise known as “DOMA.”  That position puts Miller at odds with Iowa’s Senior Senator, Charles Grassley, who filed a friend-of-the-court brief urging the Supreme Court to uphold  DOMA.  Senator Grassley and nine of his colleagues argue that several federal interests support the statute and that defining marriage in the traditional sense does not amount to unconstitutional animus towards same-sex couples.

On March 26, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Hollingsworth v. Perry; the next day the Court will hear argument in United States v. Windsor (the DOMA case).

SHARE

FEATURED POSTS

Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Immunity in Horse-Drawn Mower Injury Case

The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a personal injury claim arising from an accident involving a horse-drawn sickle mower in a unanimous decision filed on June 12, 2026. In Shafer v. Santana, the Court held that a farmer operating a horse drawn sickle mower was engaged in the “domesticated animal activity” of driving under Iowa’s Domesticated Animal Activities Act, despite the fact that the horses were briefly stopped when the injury occurred.

Iowa Supreme Court affirms child endangerment convictions and extends emotional harm theory to siblings

In a 5–2 decision filed on June 12, 2026, the Iowa Supreme Court in State v. Gibbs upheld a mother’s three child endangerment convictions under Iowa Code section 726.6(1)(a). Chief Justice Christensen wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices McDonald, Oxley, McDermott, and May. Justice Mansfield filed a partial dissent, joined by Justice Waterman, concurring as to two convictions but dissenting as to the third.

EDITORIAL TEAM

ABOUT

On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

RELATED BLOGS

Related Links

ARCHIVES