Eighth Circuit Grants Rehearing En Banc in Funeral Protest Case

by Ryan Koopmans | December 13, 2011

By Ryan Koopmans

The Eighth Circuit has lined up its second en banc argument for January.  Last week, the court granted a Missouri city’s request in Phelps-Roper v. City of Manchester  to reconsider whether the city may ban funeral picketing within 300 feet of a funeral home, church, or cemetery one hour before and after a funeral.  Several cities passed similar ordinances when the Westboro Baptist Church began picketing military funerals in 2005.  That group believes that God hates and punishes the United States for its tolerance of homosexuality; it expresses those views by carrying signs with messages such as “God Hates the USA/Thank God for 9/11,” and “Thank God for IEDs.”

Although the Eighth Circuit rarely grants en banc review, its decision to do so here comes as no surprise.  In 2008, a three-judge panel in Phelps-Roper v. Nixon enjoined a similar limitation on funeral protests, stating the  law likely violated the First Amendment.  Five judges–Riley, Colloton, Gruender, Benton, and Shepherd–voted to rehear that case.  (That’s one vote short of the total needed for en banc review.)  The panel’s decision in Phelps-Roper v. Nixon also squarely conflicts with the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Phelps-Roper v. Strickland(Yes, the cases involve the same plaintiff.)

Judge Murphy likely provided the sixth vote to rehear City of Manchester. Although she didn’t vote to rehear Nixon, Judge Murphy’s  concurring opinion in City of Manchester reads more like a dissent.  And two weeks after she published that opinion,  Judge Murphy wrote in Phelps-Roper v. Troutman that Nixon should be “reconsidered by the full court.”  (In that same case, Judge Colloton also wrote a two-sentence concurrence in which he reaffirmed his desire for en banc review of the issue.)

When the court meets in January, it likely will focus on whether the captive-audience doctrine–a doctrine that generally applies to protests at a person’s home—extends to laws governing protests at funerals.  The U.S. Supreme Court left that question open last year in Snyder v. Phelps because the protesters in Snyder (also members of the Westboro church) stayed “well away from the memorial service.”  In contrast, the ordinance in this case bans protests only within 300 feet of the funeral.  As the United States pointed out in its amicus brief in support of the city, that’s less than the length of the block surrounding the federal courthouse in St. Louis, where the en banc court will hear oral arguments on January 9, 2012.




Iowa Constitution mandates face-to-face confrontation by witness, Iowa Supreme Court rules

A defendant’s right under the Iowa Constitution to confront witnesses at trial is not satisfied by one-way video testimony where the witness testifying on camera is not able to see the defendant, the Iowa Supreme Court held in a 4-3 ruling handed down June 28. In reaching that conclusion, the Court declined to follow a U.S. Supreme Court precedent and overruled one of its own prior rulings.

April 2024 Opinion Roundup

The Iowa Supreme Court entered opinions in nine cases during April 2024.  Opinions from April not covered elsewhere on the blog are summarized below.



On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.


Related Links