Eighth Circuit Panels No Longer “Free to Choose”

by Ryan Koopmans | September 7, 2011

By Ryan Koopmans

In the Eighth Circuit, as in every other circuit, one three-judge panel may not overrule a decision of a previous panel.  But what happens when the later panel overlooks a previous decision and reaches the opposite outcome?  These intra-circuit splits don’t occur often, but they do happen.  The court issues hundreds of decisions each year; it’s not surprising that the attorneys and judges overlook precedent on occasion.

Until today, an Eighth Circuit panel confronting an intra-circuit split was free to choose the decision it found most persuasive.  And the panel after that was free to do the same.  So were district courts within the circuit. That rule has been criticized by some members of the court, and has now been overruled by the court’s en banc decision in  Mader v. United States.  Bringing the Eighth Circuit in line with the majority of circuits, the court held that a panel facing an intra-circuit split must follow the earlier decision, “as it should have controlled the subsequent panels that created the conflict.”




March 2024 Opinion Roundup

The Iowa Supreme Court entered opinions in ten cases during March 2024. These opinions are summarized below.

Iowa Supreme Court sends ‘stand your ground’ case back for new trial

Lasondra Johnson was tried for first-degree murder for the shooting death of Jada Young-Mills outside a Waterloo residence. Johnson argued she acted in self defense and the shooting was justified under Iowa’s “stand your ground” law that says a person is justified in the use of reasonable force in the belief that such …



On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.


Related Links