UPDATES & ANALYSIS

12.07

Iowa Court of Appeals Affirms Lack of Standing in Case Seeking Separate Ballot for Judicial Retention Elections

by Ryan Koopmans | December 7, 2011

By Ryan Koopmans

Today the Iowa Court of Appeals decided that “printing a judicial election ballot on the same piece of paper as the general election ballot” will not lead to a “constitutional crisis,” and thus there is insufficient justification to waive the requirement of standing.  In so doing, the court affirmed the dismissal of a case brought by three Iowa attorneys (and voters) who sought a declaratory judgment that the use of a combined ballot to conduct both the general election and judicial retention elections violates Article V, Section 17 of the Iowa Constitution and is thus “illegal and void.”  The plaintiffs also sought a ruling “requiring a separate ballot for judicial elections in the future.”

The plaintiffs had asked the court to apply an exception to the standing requirement, which generally demands that plaintiffs show they are interested in the litigation and have suffered an injury in order to pursue a claim, when “the issue is of utmost importance and the constitutional protections are most needed.”  As the Court of Appeals noted, Iowa’s Supreme Court “has recognized the possibility of a ‘great public importance’ exception to standing,” but “has never found an issue of sufficient public import to apply the exception.”  Here, the Court of Appeals decided that the propriety of the use of a combined ballot “is not a question of the ‘utmost importance’ requiring us to apply, for the first time, an exception to standing.”  The case is George v. Schultz.

SHARE

Tags:

FEATURED POSTS

October 2024 Opinion Roundup

The Iowa Supreme Court entered opinions in eight cases in October 2024. In addition to Rox Laird’s analysis of State of Iowa v. William Noble Chaiden Miller and Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa summarized on this blog, the remaining opinions from October are summarized below.

Iowa Supreme Court deadlocks on specifics required for liability waivers

When Dubuque police officer Katherine Avenarius accidentally shot herself in the leg while attending an Iowa Law Enforcement Academy firearms instructor school, she sued the academy claiming her injury was the result of an instructor’s advice on how to handle her firearm that contradicted how she had previously been trained. The State, which operates the academy, argued Avenarius signed a “clear and unequivocal” waiver and release of liability.

Iowa Supreme Court upholds minimum prison term for juvenile convicted of murder

The Iowa Supreme Court upheld a 35-year minimum prison sentence for a Fairfield juvenile who pleaded guilty to first degree murder for the death of his high school Spanish teacher. In its unanimous decision, the Court rejected the defendant’s argument that, under the Iowa Constitution, the State must present expert testimony showing a minimum sentence is necessary for a juvenile offender.

EDITORIAL TEAM

ABOUT

On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

RELATED BLOGS

Related Links

ARCHIVES