UPDATES & ANALYSIS

10.28

Iowa Supreme Court: Go ahead, live-tweet us

by Ryan Koopmans | October 28, 2013

By Ryan Koopmans

Today, the Iowa Supreme Court proposed new rules that would allow “news media” to live-tweet and blog oral arguments and other judicial proceedings.

I’m happy to report that “news media” includes the good folks here at On Brief and any other “person who regularly gathers, prepares, photographs, records, writes, edits, reports, or publishes news or information about matters of public interest in any medium, and who successfully applied to participate in expanded news media coverage and agreed to comply with all court rules.” SCOTUSblogeat your heart out.

Live-tweeting isn’t entirely new for the Iowa Supreme Court.  Last February, the justices allowed former Des Moines Register reporter Jeff Eckhoff to give his play-by-play of an oral argument about class actions and bed bug infestations.  Fittingly, Eckhoff started the night with this:

Of course, it’s been technically possible to live-tweet the Iowa Supreme Court’s arguments for some time, since they’re streamed on the Judicial Branch website.  But it’s more fun to be in the courtroom.  And the new rules go beyond Supreme Court arguments.

You can follow this blog (and our future live-tweeting sessions) at @nyemaster and @RyanGKoopmans.

SHARE

Tags:

FEATURED POSTS

Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Immunity in Horse-Drawn Mower Injury Case

The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a personal injury claim arising from an accident involving a horse-drawn sickle mower in a unanimous decision filed on June 12, 2026. In Shafer v. Santana, the Court held that a farmer operating a horse drawn sickle mower was engaged in the “domesticated animal activity” of driving under Iowa’s Domesticated Animal Activities Act, despite the fact that the horses were briefly stopped when the injury occurred.

Iowa Supreme Court affirms child endangerment convictions and extends emotional harm theory to siblings

In a 5–2 decision filed on June 12, 2026, the Iowa Supreme Court in State v. Gibbs upheld a mother’s three child endangerment convictions under Iowa Code section 726.6(1)(a). Chief Justice Christensen wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices McDonald, Oxley, McDermott, and May. Justice Mansfield filed a partial dissent, joined by Justice Waterman, concurring as to two convictions but dissenting as to the third.

EDITORIAL TEAM

ABOUT

On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

RELATED BLOGS

Related Links

ARCHIVES