UPDATES & ANALYSIS

5.11

Nyemaster Goode Attorneys Comment on Legislation That Would Overrule Supreme Court Decision

by Iowa Appeals Blog | May 11, 2012

Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, an employer may not discriminate against an employee “because of” his or her age. Although the phrase “because of” does not seem so ambiguous, the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to interpret those words three years ago in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. Based on the arguments of Nyemaster Goode attorneys Frank Harty and Deb Hulett and their former colleague Jordan Hansell, the Court ruled that “because of” means “but for”—that is, but for age discrimination, the employee would not have been fired.

Iowa Senators Charles Grassley and Tom Harkin disagree with that ruling, and they have introduced legislation to overrule it.  In this Spring’s Defense Update, Harty and Hulett critique that legislation and discuss its implications.  The article, titled POWADA: A Gross Overreaction, is here.

SHARE

Tags:

FEATURED POSTS

Iowa Supreme Court affirms child endangerment convictions and extends emotional harm theory to siblings

In a 5–2 decision filed on June 12, 2026, the Iowa Supreme Court in State v. Gibbs upheld a mother’s three child endangerment convictions under Iowa Code section 726.6(1)(a). Chief Justice Christensen wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices McDonald, Oxley, McDermott, and May. Justice Mansfield filed a partial dissent, joined by Justice Waterman, concurring as to two convictions but dissenting as to the third.

EDITORIAL TEAM

ABOUT

On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

RELATED BLOGS

Related Links

ARCHIVES