UPDATES & ANALYSIS

7.31

Supreme Court: Tax Credit Film Budgets Not Confidential

by Ryan Stefani | July 31, 2012

[The following summary was written by Ryan Stefani, a law clerk in Nyemaster Goode’s summer program.]

On July 27, 2012, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that filmmakers who received tax credits from the state must disclose their final budget summaries. The Court found that the filmmakers failed to establish that the information at issue was exempt from the Iowa Open Records Act.

The filmmakers argued that their budget summaries were exempt from the Open Records Act for three reasons; the Court rejected all of them. First, the Court concluded that the summaries did not fall under the definition of “trade secrets” as it applies to the Open Records Act’s trade secret exemption. The filmmakers then advanced two alternative theories of exemption, both of which rested on a showing that disclosure of the budget summaries advanced no public interest. In rejecting these arguments, the Court reasoned that Iowa’s film tax credit program involves the allocation of millions of taxpayer dollars, and the public has an interest in knowing how this money is spent.

Justice Mansfield wrote for all Justices except Justice Zager, who took no part. The full opinion may be accessed here.

SHARE

Tags:

FEATURED POSTS

Slim Supreme Court majority allows public defender to withdraw from representing indigent defendant

Trial courts have a duty under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to assure that a criminal defendant who cannot afford to hire a lawyer is provided one at the State’s expense. To comply with that constitutional mandate, Iowa created the Office of State Public Defender (SPD) to employ attorneys to provide indigent defense or to contract with attorneys in private practice willing to take on those criminal cases.

Iowa Supreme Court: TikTok must face the State’s consumer fraud suit in Iowa court

Online video provider TikTok does business with millions of American users in all 50 states, including Iowans who have downloaded the company’s app hundreds of thousands of times and who agree to its terms of service. Still, the company argues, it should not have to defend itself against a lawsuit filed in state court by the Iowa Attorney General claiming the company misrepresents the nature of its content available to Iowa children.

EDITORIAL TEAM

ABOUT

On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

RELATED BLOGS

Related Links

ARCHIVES