UPDATES & ANALYSIS

5.02

Supreme Court to issue birth-certificate decision tomorrow

by Ryan Koopmans | May 2, 2013

By Ryan Koopmans

Tomorrow, the Iowa Supreme Court will decide whether the presumption of paternity–whereby the husband is presumed to be the father of his wife’s child, and therefore listed on the birth certificate–must apply to a same-sex spouse under the Iowa Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause.  The case, Gartner v. Iowa Department of Public Health, was argued in December and is one of the most anticipated Iowa Supreme Court decisions of this term.

Heather and Melissa Gartner married in 2009, shortly after the Iowa Supreme Court ruled in Varnum that Iowa’s ban on same-sex marriage violated the Iowa Constitution. In September of the same year, Heather gave birth to a daughter, who was conceived by artificial insemination through an anonymous donor.

Heather and Melissa requested that both of their names be placed on the birth certificate, but the Iowa Department of Public Health listed Heather only.  Melissa could be added, the Department told them, but only if she adopted the child because Iowa’s birth-certificate statute is based on paternity: “Unless paternity has been determined otherwise by a court” the “name of the husband shall be entered on the certificate as the father of the child.”

The Gartners challenged that decision in Iowa District Court and won.  Judge Eliza Ovrom ruled that in light of Varnum, the birth-certificate statute must be interpreted in a gender-neutral fashion: “husband” should be read as “spouse” and “father” should be read as “parent.”

The Department appealed the ruling, arguing that the gender-specific nature of the statute has meaning beyond marriage–that it goes to paternity and therefore that Varnum does not affect the statute.

The briefs in the case are linked below:

Iowa Department of Public Health Opening Brief
Gartner Brief
Amicus brief of the Family Policy Center in support of the Department
Amicus brief of the ACLU in support of the Gartners
Amicus brief of the National Association of Social Workers in support of the Gartners
Amicus brief of law professors in support of the Gartners

SHARE

Tags:

FEATURED POSTS

October 2024 Opinion Roundup

The Iowa Supreme Court entered opinions in eight cases in October 2024. In addition to Rox Laird’s analysis of State of Iowa v. William Noble Chaiden Miller and Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa summarized on this blog, the remaining opinions from October are summarized below.

Iowa Supreme Court deadlocks on specifics required for liability waivers

When Dubuque police officer Katherine Avenarius accidentally shot herself in the leg while attending an Iowa Law Enforcement Academy firearms instructor school, she sued the academy claiming her injury was the result of an instructor’s advice on how to handle her firearm that contradicted how she had previously been trained. The State, which operates the academy, argued Avenarius signed a “clear and unequivocal” waiver and release of liability.

Iowa Supreme Court upholds minimum prison term for juvenile convicted of murder

The Iowa Supreme Court upheld a 35-year minimum prison sentence for a Fairfield juvenile who pleaded guilty to first degree murder for the death of his high school Spanish teacher. In its unanimous decision, the Court rejected the defendant’s argument that, under the Iowa Constitution, the State must present expert testimony showing a minimum sentence is necessary for a juvenile offender.

EDITORIAL TEAM

ABOUT

On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

RELATED BLOGS

Related Links

ARCHIVES