UPDATES & ANALYSIS

5.28

“Mail” now means “email” under the Administrative Procedure Act, Iowa Supreme Court rules

by Rox Laird | May 28, 2019

When the Iowa Legislature enacted the Administrative Procedure Act in 1975, the statute required petitioners to notify the other parties by mail. That meant sending a paper copy of the petition through the mail within 10 days, or delivery in person under a 1981 amendment.

Today lawyers, like most all other professionals, send letters and documents via email. And the Iowa Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision handed down May 24, said that satisfies the requirements of the law (Ortiz v. Roling Construction and Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance).

One day after Isaac Oritz filed a petition in Polk County District Court appealing a decision by the Iowa Workers’ Compensation Commissioner, his attorney emailed a time-stamped copy of the petition to counsel for Roling Construction, Ortiz’s employer.

Ortiz’s lawyer subsequently sent a copy of the petition by regular mail at the request of Roling’s lawyer, but by that time the statute’s 10-day deadline had expired. The trial court dismissed the petition, saying the statute required delivery of the petition by postal or personal service, and that decision was upheld by the Iowa Court of Appeals.

In its ruling overturning both decisions, the Supreme Court held that the service requirement under Iowa Code Section 17A.19(2) “is properly construed to include email ‘made upon the parties’ attorney of record’ when done pursuant to Iowa Court Rules governing electronic service.”

Writing for the court, Chief Justice Mark Cady said email has largely displaced mail by the postal service in most instances, including the legal system.

“Our Legislature used the word ‘mail’ in 1975 and 1981 to describe current routine systematic methods of sending written communications,” Cady wrote. “At the time, the current method was postal service. But this, however, should not preclude the word to apply to a means of communication that would later displace postal mail as the standard and most reliable means of routine, reliable communication.”

SHARE

Tags: , ,

FEATURED POSTS

October 2024 Opinion Roundup

The Iowa Supreme Court entered opinions in eight cases in October 2024. In addition to Rox Laird’s analysis of State of Iowa v. William Noble Chaiden Miller and Katherine Avenarius and Paul Avenarius v. State of Iowa summarized on this blog, the remaining opinions from October are summarized below.

Iowa Supreme Court deadlocks on specifics required for liability waivers

When Dubuque police officer Katherine Avenarius accidentally shot herself in the leg while attending an Iowa Law Enforcement Academy firearms instructor school, she sued the academy claiming her injury was the result of an instructor’s advice on how to handle her firearm that contradicted how she had previously been trained. The State, which operates the academy, argued Avenarius signed a “clear and unequivocal” waiver and release of liability.

Iowa Supreme Court upholds minimum prison term for juvenile convicted of murder

The Iowa Supreme Court upheld a 35-year minimum prison sentence for a Fairfield juvenile who pleaded guilty to first degree murder for the death of his high school Spanish teacher. In its unanimous decision, the Court rejected the defendant’s argument that, under the Iowa Constitution, the State must present expert testimony showing a minimum sentence is necessary for a juvenile offender.

EDITORIAL TEAM

ABOUT

On Brief: Iowa’s Appellate Blog is devoted to appellate litigation with a focus on the Iowa Supreme Court, the Iowa Court of Appeals, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

RELATED BLOGS

Related Links

ARCHIVES